Thursday, January 16, 2014

Exclusive Interview: A captain in exile (An Interview taken By Nadeem F. Paracha)


“Most captains and cricketers improve their records at home, on grounds that they played their initial cricket on and in front of home crowds,” sighs the enigmatic Pakistan cricket captain, Misbah-ul-Haq.

He is talking to me in a secluded corner of the hotel where the Pakistan team was staying during the recently concluded Test match against Sri Lanka in Dubai.

The team is now getting ready to travel to Sharjah for the third and last Test of the series.

Misbah is rueing the fact that he hasn’t been able to captain the Pakistan side in a Test in Pakistan. No team has been willing to tour the country after the bizarre 2009 terrorist attack on the Sri Lankan side in Lahore.

Ever since he was made the captain in late 2011, Misbah has captained the side in 26 Tests, all on foreign soil. He’s won 11 of these and lost seven.

“More than half of my side has never played for Pakistan in Pakistan,” he laments. “We have continuously been playing abroad for years now. Apart from players like Younis, Hafeez and I, most of the players in the side today have no idea what it means to play international cricket at home.”

Though, ever since he got the captaincy he has continued to be Pakistan’s leading run-scorer, Misbah has also managed to gather a number of critics.

Most of them believe he is too defensive as a captain, and that he goes into a shell too often while batting. But interestingly, his record as a captain and batsman in the last three years actually contradicts such criticism.

“I do not mind constructive criticism,” he claims. “But it should remain within the boundaries of the ethics and values that I exhibit towards my critics. There is only so much one can tolerate.”

A lot of criticism that has come his way is indeed misplaced, if not entirely wrong. He was made the captain when the team was in total disarray. After former captain, Inzamam-ul-Haq’s retirement in 2007, the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) had to change five captains until finally settling for Misbah.

Shoaib Malik replaced Inzamam but lost form and influence and was replaced by Mohammad Yousuf, who, though a stylish stroke-maker, was never captaincy material.

Solid middle-order batsman, Younis Khan, became the new skipper but resigned within a year, allegedly due to a players’ rebellion against him.

He was replaced by the temperamental all-rounder, Shahid Afridi, who retired from Test cricket after leading Pakistan in just a single Test. Opener, Salman Butt was made Pakistan’s fifth Test captain in a rocky span of just two years, but he was fired after being caught dealing with shady spot-fixers.

When Misbah was handed over the captaincy, not only was the team in a terrible flux, the country too, had been tumbling down the spiral of extremist violence and political turmoil. What is more, Misbah at the time was trying to make his third comeback after he was first selected to play for Pakistan in 2001.
Making his debut at the age of 26, Misbah soon lost his form and place in the side just before the 2003 World Cup in South Africa.

After the event, captain, Waqar Younis, along with his legendary fast bowling partner, Wasim Akram, retired from the game, and a number of established players were dropped due to the team’s horrendous performance in the tournament.

Wicketkeeper, Rashid Latif replaced Waqar as captain but was soon replaced by the dashing stroke-maker, Inzamam-ul-Haq.

New spots and positions opened up and the selectors began to look for replacements. But, in spite of performing well in the domestic circuit, Misbah just couldn’t find his way back onto the side.

Misbah finally returned to the team in 2007 after spending four years in seclusion, at the age of 33.

Former Chairman of the PCB and diplomat, Shaharyar Khan, wrote in his most recent book that Misbah’s return to the squad was blocked by Inzamam.

According to Khan, Misbah was far more educated than Inzamam and had a better cricketing brain. This threatened Inzamam who was very insecure about his captaincy.

Then, early last year a leading Urdu daily alleged that Inzamam, who was trying to change the culture of the team by infusing a particular brand of Islam into the squad, kept Misbah out because he knew Misbah would never have toed the new line.

I asked Misbah about his sudden disappearance from the scene and whether Shaharyar Khan was correct in stating what he did (in his book).

“It’s a matter of perceptions,” he answered, guardedly. “I personally want to believe that politics or whatever is not what kept me out of Inzamam’s team. I don’t think any captain would like to keep out a player he thinks would be good for the team. I think with Younis, Yousuf and Inzamam so well established in the middle-order, it was always tough for a middle-order batsman like me to break my way back into the team. Then, all-rounders like Shoaib Malik, Afridi and Razzaq were also part of the Test and ODI squads in those days.”

Misbah’s diplomacy in the matter is understandable. He’s still the captain of a volatile cricket team of an equally volatile country. But I did ask him what made Shaharyar Khan, a highly respected diplomat and cricket insider; say what he did about his (Misbah’s) exclusion from Inzamam’s team.

“As I said, it’s a matter of perceptions,” he repeated. “That is how Shaharyar Sahib saw things. That’s his perception. Inzamam, I am sure, he has his (perception) about the issue, and I have mine. But I would like to believe that it wasn’t politics that kept me out.”

Sensing his hesitation to commit himself any further to the topic, I return to talk about his present-day critics.

During the Dubai Test, most of which I saw from the general stands, I noticed a genuine respect and admiration for Misbah by all sorts of folks who came to watch the game: Labourers, taxi drivers, young school kids.

It wasn’t the kind of raunchy, passionate reception players like Afridi get in this part of the world, it was something more subtle.

As the crowd saw Misbah yet again stand firm and try to stem the fall of wickets that usually stumble like nine pins around him, shouts of “Well done, Misbah,” “Jammahrai, Misbah” (stay there, Misbah), continued to echo around the stadium, even when he would just dab the ball for a single or two.

As he has gone on to accumulate big scores in Tests and ODIs, his fans have increased as well. In fact, he has also managed to attract some of his most vehement critics on to his side.

Former Pakistan captains and famous commentators, Ramiz Raja and Waqar Younis, both of whom had been critical of his captaincy in the past, were recently heard praising Misbah not only as a captain and batsman, but as a person as well.

Ramiz praised him for keeping things from spinning out of control with his calm and reserved disposition, whereas Waqar described him as being a thorough gentleman.

But, there still remain to be some former players who are not convinced. I asked Misbah that isn’t it strange that some former players, who understood the pressures of captaining a team like Pakistan, have continued to criticise him, considering the circumstances he was given the captaincy in?

“I always welcome criticism. I’m not afraid of being criticised. But sometimes when it becomes criticism for the sake of criticism, I begin to ignore it,” he explained.

What about his family, how do they cope with it?

Misbah breaks into a slight smile: “It’s tough for them.” But the smile slowly begins to fade as he continues: “My family members had actually suffered health issues due to the kind of things they sometimes have to hear about me. I have learned to ignore certain things, and I can escape all the talk by being on tours, but my family doesn’t always travel with me. They are sometimes hurt by what they hear on TV back home. They are a lot more sensitive to negative criticism than I am.”

Misbah is famous for absorbing all kinds of pressures on and off the field. Though known to be a very private, quiet and stoic man, he is also liked in the team for his dry sense of humour and subtle wit. Does this help him in handling pressure?

The smile returns: “I’ve always been this way. My love for the game has kept me going. I try never to quit. Thrice I lost my place in the side and thrice I came back, stronger than ever. One just needs to focus on the goals he or she has set for themselves, the rest takes its own course.”

So he keeps his wits about him?

“I have too. I have to make sure the team and I continue to enjoy playing the game.”

A year ago, Misbah lost the captaincy of Pakistan’s T20 side. He also lost his place in the T20 squad. The selectors believed that Misbah, now 39, was too old for the hectic pace of this format of the game.

And yet, he was the highest and fastest scoring batsman in the 2013 national T20 tournament. He was also in crackling form when he took his domestic T20 side, the Faisalabad Wolves, to India for the IPL, where he smashed 13 sixes in just two games. So, does he think he’s too old for T20?

“I believe I can still play all formats of the game,” he insists. “I enjoy playing T20 as much as I do Tests and ODIs. But when the selectors told me that my being in the T20 squad might be blocking the entry of some younger players, I stepped aside myself. I did it for the youngsters. But I am still available for the T20 format if the selectors believe I have a role to play there.”

Misbah was replaced by Mohammad Hafeez as the T20 captain. Hafeez has been Misbah’s vice captain in Tests and ODIs.

Last year when Pakistan was being taken to the cleaners by the South Africans in South Africa, media reports began to emerge about a possible rift between Misbah and Hafeez.

The charismatic former Australian captain and commentator, Ian Chappell, once said that behind every successful cricket captain, is a good vice captain.

There have been many examples of this in international cricket, and in Pakistan cricket too, some of the strongest captains have had solid (and loyal) vice captains.

Mushtaq Mohammad had Asif Iqbal; Imran Khan had Javed Miandad; Wasim Akram first had Waqar Younis and then the dependable, Moin Khan. Inzamam-ul-Haq had Younis Khan.

However, in most cases, these firm and successful partnerships ended in animosity between the skippers and their once loyal deputies.

At the end of his career, Mushtaq accused Asif Iqbal of underhandedly usurping the captaincy away from him (in 1979), whereas after Miandad finally replaced Imran as skipper in 1992, he accused the ex-captain of encouraging Wasim Akram to lead a players’ rebellion against him in 1993.

Akram himself was toppled in a players’ rebellion led by his vice captain, Waqar Younis, even though one of the rebelling players, Basit Ali, recently told cricket expert, Dr. Nauman Niaz, that the rebellion was mostly masterminded by leg-spinner, Mushtaq Ahmed.

When Inzamam retired, it was said that his vice captain, Younis Khan, had had a falling out with Inzamam during the latter’s twilight years as skipper.

Misbah has now become a deserving candidate for joining the ranks of other renowned Pakistani cricket captains such as Hafeez Kardar, Mushtaq Mohammad, Imran Khan, Javed Miandad and Wasim Akram. And in Mohammad Hafeez, Misbah has found an able deputy, with a sharp cricketing brain.

But was the media right in pointing out that the pair was starting to experience the dreaded captain and vice captain fall-out?

“The whole episode was dreamt up in the minds of some journalists,” says Misbah, dismissively.

“There has always been very good understanding between Hafeez and myself. Even when we played domestic cricket together, we used to willingly let go of the captaincy for the benefit of the other. The media made Hafeez look like a man who was hungry for the captaincy and was willing to do anything to get it,” Misbah softly chuckled.

Wasn’t he?

“Absolutely not!” says Misbah, his usually stable and steady stare getting a tad intense. “He never ran after captaincy and neither have I. We just like playing cricket. If, for example, tomorrow the selectors select me in the T20 squad, I will have no problem playing under his captaincy.”

As media reports about the rift began to become the main topic of sports shows on local TV channels, Misbah and Hafeez decided to hold a joint press conference to quash the rumours. They were largely successful and the rumour gradually faded away.

We now come back to how Misbah’s team has been forced to play all of their matches on foreign soil. I asked that though the UAE is said to have become a home away from home for the Pakistan cricket team, does the team feel the same way?

“Not really,” says Misbah. “I mean, we get good crowds of Pakistanis supporting us at the stadiums here, but it’s still another country. None of us can go to our real homes after the day’s play. We all have to go back to a hotel.”

What about the pitches? Does he have as much say in their preparation here as he would have had in Pakistan?

Misbah slowly shakes his head: “Unfortunately not. In Pakistan, a captain would personally know a groundsman and vice versa, and it would be easier for him to get the kind of a pitch that would truly help him gain what is called, the home advantage.

Here (in the UAE) sometimes I’m not even sure who is going to prepare the pitches. For example, I didn’t get the kind of pitches I was looking for against the South Africans and the Sri Lankans. Back home, the groundsman would fully understand the strengths of our bowling line-up and prepare pitches according to this understanding. Here, somehow, something gets lost in communication. For example, for the first and second Tests against the Lankans, I had asked for hard and bouncy pitches that would help our quick bowlers who hit the deck hard. These kind of pitches then go on to help spinners like Saeed (Ajmal) in the latter stages of the Test. Instead, we got pitches that had grass and seamed on the first day, but then totally flattened out. In the second Test, the Lankans won a crucial toss and bowled well on a seaming wicket.”

After going quiet for a bit, he added: “Maybe it was the uncharacteristic weather. It was colder and wetter than usual in the UAE this year. Conditions were good for swing and seam bowling. Our bowlers rely more on pace and bounce.”

At least twice, young Pakistani cricket fans tried to interrupt and asked Misbah for an autograph. He politely declined saying he was doing an interview.

Then one of the four main lifts in the hotel lobby opened and out came the team’s Australian coach, Dav Whatmore. With him were his wife, the team’s fielding coach, and physio.

After glancing at Misbah, they sat down on a nearby cluster of sofas, ready to leave for Sharjah. Moin came back through the front door with Misbah’s wife and they joined Whatmore and company.

But Misbah did not flinch even once. He stared at me again, waiting for another round of questions.

“All set for Sharjah?” I asked. He shrugged his shoulders: “Yes. We are leaving today.”

As he said this, left-arm spinner, Abdur Rehman, and young opener, Shan Masood, arrived with their luggage as well. Both are expected to get their first games in the Test series in Sharjah.

I asked how the atmosphere in the team was these days. It had been highly volatile when he took over as captain, with infighting and the team tarnished by cases of spot-fixing.

“Things are settling,” he said. “But the team is quickly evolving. Lots of young players are coming in.”

Before Inzamam took over as captain in 2003, the Pakistan cricket teams were known for their flamboyant ways both on and off the field. Players were extremely outgoing and loved their bit of partying.

Things began to change in this respect under Inzamam. Introversion and inertia crept in and the players’ interaction with the other teams and with the cultures of the countries they were touring reduced drastically.

Things got even worse when Salman Butt, Mohammad Asif and Mohammad Amir were hurled up and kicked out for spot-fixing.

When Misbah took over, he was given a team harassed by the media, suspected by the ICC, and asked by the PCB to keep a low profile at all times.

Misbah agrees: “It was very tough. We would go straight to the hotel from the stadium, and stay there.”

What about now?

“It’s much better. We’ve given some good performances and a lot of youngsters have come in. Their presence has infused a lot of new energy into the team’s culture,” he smiles.

He also praises Moin Khan for this: “Ever since Moin’s appointment as Manager, we have become more outgoing. He comes from that era of Pakistan cricket when cricket was much more than just being about batting, bowling and fielding. He encourages the boys to interact more with other teams and go out for dinners and to events outside of cricket.”

Moin was made the Manager by PCB’s caretaker chief, Najam Sethi. Sethi, a well-known liberal journalist and TV anchor, was asked to head the PCB by Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif last year.

But his powers were seriously curtailed by the Islamabad High Court. This meant his decision to name Moin as the new chief selector was reversed by the court. Sethi responded by making him the manager.

As Sethi waits to see whether he would be allowed more powers, Misbah does not appreciate the instability created by the court’s decision: “These sorts of things affect the team. You strike up a good working relationship with the management only to see it being neutralised.”

He seems to have struck a good relationship with Sethi and Moin. And he hopes things don’t take a drastic turn at the board level.

“A stable team requires a stable management,” he quips.

(Editor’s note: On January 15, Sethi was removed as PCB Chief by the Islamabad High Court. The Court reinstated Zaka Ashraf as PCB chairman, even though it had been the same court that had removed Ashraf).

Seeing the players slowly gathering in the lobby, I asked Misbah whether he’s had any players who have been tough to handle.

Captains in the past struggled to reign in highly talented but temperamental players such as the late Wasim Raja and Sarfraz Nawaz. Inzamam had no clue how to handle firebrands like Shoaib Akhtar.

“Not as such,” Misbah says. “The seniors are very professional and most of the team is still very young.”

I tell him how during an interview of his when he was captain; Imran had said that a captain has to get along with even those players he may detest as people, as long as the players were beneficial to the team’s cause.

“Exactly,” Misbah responded. “But I see it slightly differently. I see teams like being large, extended families with all kinds of people. They play, work and rejoice together, but they may also develop differences, just like in any family. But a family knows that it has to stick together to survive, and survive successfully. That’s how I see my team. We are a family of different individuals but with similar goals.”

It is quite apparent that Misbah has successfully won the loyalty and respect of the team.

He has a quiet but strong presence that demands a lot of physical and mental space around him, because no player or official attempted to even come close to the area where I was interviewing him.

It was only after he got up, shook my hand and bid farewell that the players who were there began to gravitate towards him.

The team and its captain may be in perpetual exile, but home seems to be the foremost thing on their minds. And each one of them knows, that though they have done relatively well abroad, their individual records and that of the team’s could have been twice as good had they also been playing on home grounds, in front of home crowds.

But till that comes about, Misbah will take whatever life throws at him as he grows into becoming Pakistan’s senior most cricketing statesman in a world that would not come to Pakistan.


Provinces to maintain wheat price at Rs1,200 this year


ISLAMABAD: The National Assembly Standing Committee on National Food Security on Wednesday witnessed disagreement among provinces over the issue of fixing wheat support price for 2014, with Punjab, Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan agreeing to maintain last year’s price while Sindh proposing an increase in the price.

However, after a debate on the single-item agenda — support price for wheat — the committee built the consensus that the government should maintain last year’s price of Rs1200 per 40kg.

Pir Shafqat Hussain Jilani, a PPPP MNA from Sindh told ‘Dawn’ that Sindh had wanted to raise the wheat support price to Rs1350 per 40kg instead of Rs1200 per 40kg in view of rising cost of inputs but had to join ranks of other provinces to keep last year’s support price.

The committee members had asked the Ministry of National Food Security to announce the wheat support price for 2014 sowing season. During the meeting, the members agreed with Minister for National Food Security Sikandar Hayat Khan Bosan that announcement of price at this stage, when sowing of wheat has already been completed, will benefit the middlemen and not the farmers.

Mr Bosan informed the committee that sufficient stock of wheat is available with the government to meet the requirement till the arrival of the new crop in the market.

The committee which met under the chairmanship of Malik Shakir Awan, recommended to the government to save growers from losses due to high rates of fertilisers, electricity and diesel, and to give subsidy to them as being given in neighbouring countries.

On the issue of strengthening the Ministry of National Food Security, the committee members unanimously expressed deep concern over the reduction in PSDP of the ministry from Rs24 billion to Rs750 million after the devolution.

The committee recommended that the departments of federal government like Sugar Board and Cotton Commissionerate which were previously part of the ministry should be merged with the ministry in order to streamline the working and performance of the ministry.

The committee was pleased over the award of GSP Plus status to Pakistan, and in this regard noted that the rates of cotton in the country are comparatively less than other countries. The anti-dumping duty and other taxes should be reduced to achieve the maximum benefit from GSP, it said.

The committee was of the opinion that cotton support price cannot be announced but calculated every year. Cotton cultivation area is insufficient, and the government should take measures to enhance the area under cotton cultivation in order to increase cotton production to meet the local and international requirements, the committee recommended.

Source: www.dawn.com

Multi-millionaire vows to build tallest building in China


CHANGSHA: A Chinese multi-millionaire who built himself an Egyptian pyramid and a replica of Versailles vows to construct the world's tallest building in just six months — despite authorities preventing work amid safety concerns.

Zhang Yue is worth an estimated 1.1 billion yuan ($180 million)and has grandiose aspirations, the biggest of them to build an 838 metre tall tower he calls “Sky City” by the year's end.

It is designed to be 10 metres higher than the current title-holder, the Burj Khalifa in Dubai — which took five years to construct.

But he admits the project has run into fierce opposition. “There are not many people who support us,” Zhang told AFP.

“There are too many bad people.”

Zhang, 53, made a fortune selling air-conditioners and was the first Chinese entrepreneur to own a private helicopter, but has sought to reinvent himself as a green crusader.

He retains a down-to-earth manner, eating in a staff canteen and spitting casually into a tissue as he talks, but sees himself as a visionary hoping to reshape China's cities.

The decades-long movement of hundreds of millions of people from China's countryside to its towns and conurbations is the largest migration in human history, and both a cause and effect of its economic boom, but he sees it as a road to environmental disaster.

“We have to quickly move out of this mistaken kind of urbanisation,” he said, describing Sky City, with energy-saving materials and reduced use of land, as “one such way out”.

Zhang's company Broad Sustainable Building has already built a 30 storey hotel in 15 days in the central Chinese city of Changsha.

A time-lapse video of the construction has been viewed more than five million times on YouTube and shows the concrete and metal sections being slotted into place and bolted together, akin to a gigantic Lego set.

“Our aim is not making money,” he said, lounging in bare feet on the hotel's top floor, as thick grey smog — a common sight in Chinese cities — blurred his view of surrounding fields.

“Once you have environmental consciousness, money loses meaning.”

A short man who appears to have difficulty staying still, Zhang sipped from a giant cylinder of tea as a chauffeur drove him past the 130-foot high pyramid he built on his corporate campus.

Opposite it stands a replica of France's Palace of Versailles, designed by his wife, which Zhang plans to turn into an “environmental philosophy academy”, although for now it hosts a display of North Korean paintings.

Zhang — who has renounced his helicopter citing concerns about climate change — is “not far off being an environmental activist,” said Rupert Hoogewerf, compiler of the Hurun Report, an annual Chinese rich list.

China's wealthiest — many of whom have been millionaires for more than a decade — are attempting to influence social and other issues, he said.

“These are people who have the sense they have everything financially and materially they could ever want and are now looking beyond that, to legacy and extended status.

Close to Zhang's office, workers in a cavernous hangar welded together the pre-fabricated building sections, and he insisted there would be “no problems” using the method to build Sky City.

“We will be finished by December,” he said.

“I could make an even taller building. Construction was formally launched last year, but rapidly suspended and state-run media reported authorities in Changsha had ordered a halt as it lacked proper permits."

Independent engineering experts say the Sky City concept faces a host of problems, from lift design and fireproofing to the physical compression caused by the monumental weight of the completed building.

An audience “laughed” when Zhang's plans were first presented at a meeting of the US-based Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat (CTBUH), said David Scott, a structural director at engineering firm Laing O'Rourke.

But now “people understand it's a much more serious offer”, he said. “I wouldn't say it's not feasible... Properly thought through, it will work.”

China's earthquake-proofing standards for skyscrapers are amongst the world's strictest, he added, and construction may have been delayed by a mandatory expert review of the project.

CTBUH director Antony Wood said: “I'm still sceptical, but it's with a massive amount of respect for what (Broad Group) has done so far. I'm not inclined to write it off.”

In the hotel, Zhang — who studied art and first worked as an interior decorator — brandished one of his firm's egg-shaped smartphones, which can gauge levels of tiny air pollutants known as PM2.5.

It was an attempt to demonstrate his building's immaculate air quality — although the demonstration was rendered more difficult by the cigarette he had just smoked.

Pollution is a hot-button issue in China, but Zhang still feels victimised and misunderstood. “In this society, if you try to do something good, no one will believe you," he said.

"Society lacks basic trust, and sees everything good as bad."

Source: www.dawn.com

The coup-lovers’ brigade By I.A. REHMAN

WHICHEVER way the case against the two-coup commando may go, the politicos in his line of defence have already given the people a lesson they cannot afford to ignore.

Never before in Pakistan’s history have we heard so impassioned a justification of subversion of the Constitution as is being offered by Musharraf’s auxiliary force of coup-lovers.

It is said that Musharraf could not have violated the Constitution because there was no properly made constitution in 2007, as the Constitution of 1973 was not drafted by a competent body. The authors of this theory are obviously not concerned with the chaos they are inviting. If their argument is accepted, all laws enforced, actions taken and appointments made since 1973 will be rendered invalid — a much bigger crisis than the one caused by the judgement in the Tamizuddin case whereby all laws that had not received the governor-general’s assent were invalidated.

Another Musharraf defender says that if Gen Musharraf was a traitor why did anyone take an oath before him? Taken to its logical end, the argument will make the entire population guilty of abetment. This is an echo of Justice Munir’s favourite dictum that a successful coup legitimises itself. It is necessary to save politics from being sullied by such theories of compromise.

No treasonable act can be justified by the support it may receive from opportunists or by the inability of the populace to resist it. In this regard, the judiciary’s role is also limited; it may choose not to censure a violator of the Constitution but it cannot legitimise any violation of the Constitution from which it derives its own authority.

The funniest argument from the ‘Musharraf Bachao’ caucus is that an army chief cannot commit treason. Since all coups in Pakistan have been carried out by army chiefs, and no civilian will have the means to do so, coups d’état could be deleted from the list of crimes and Article 6 dropped from the Constitution, on the ground of redundancy.

More significant is the decision by Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain to move an amendment aimed at downgrading the crime of high treason to the level of an offence against the state. Chaudhry Shujaat’s line of argument is not easy to follow. Quite a few offences are already listed in the Penal Code as crimes against the state, and the state is the complainant in most criminal trials. Where does he want to put this new crime against the state?

Chaudhry Shujaat is not the first person to want treason redefined. There was a time when the murder of a husband or employer was described as petty treason, and betrayal of trust was considered equivalent to treason. In England, an offence was described as treason felony till 1848 when it was removed from the category of treason and thenceforth described as felony only. There is no bar to anyone’s wish to define a coup d’état in Pakistan merely as a transient nuisance.

However, the doughty survivor from Gujrat has not been properly advised on the choice of grounds. His argument that a person charged with high treason should be called a traitor only if he has acted in alliance with a foreign enemy is patently facetious. The word ‘traitor’ can be used in a wide range of offences from betrayal of common cause (of an association) to anyone waging war against his own state.

The Oxford Dictionary defines treason as “violation by a subject of allegiance to the sovereign or to the state, especially by attempting or plotting to kill or overthrow the sovereign or overthrow the government”. There is no reference to association with an enemy in this definition.

No amount of hair-splitting can alter the fact that Gen Musharraf committed premeditated treason first in 1999, by overthrowing a government established by law, and again in 2007, by invoking powers to interfere with the Constitution that he, as chief of army staff, did not possess.

These arguments are unlikely to have any effect on men who are ready to barter away reason for fidelity to their patron. But three things have become clear.

First, the nation is not united on punishing Pervez Musharraf, however small in number his defenders may be. Dictators may hang politicians on the basis of a divided court’s verdict; democrats cannot ignore a split in public ranks. There is no point in proceeding against Musharraf any further. The punishment he has undergone should be considered enough. The majesty of the law has been demonstrated.

Secondly, it is fashionable to criticise only military adventurers and courts for military takeovers. The list should also include the politicians who have been keen to serve any man on horseback. Could Ziaul Haq have gotten away with murder and much worse, including the creation of Pakistan’s present-day tormentors, without the aid of politicians who had rushed to join him? The people must realise that the bosom of many a politician is home to a potential dictator.

Finally, it is now established that democratic rule cannot be protected by drafting Article 6 and revising its text now and then. It can only be protected by political parties that derive their strength from cadres who value democracy more than anything else, parties that do not treat the people as hordes of supplicants who can be bought off at a discount. The creation of such political parties should be the main concern of the people and not the fate of Chak Shahzad’s most privileged prisoner.

Source: www.dawn.com

Nawabshah tragedy: Funeral prayers of 17 victims offered


NAWABSHAH: The funeral prayers of seventeen victims mostly students, who lost their lives in a road accident in Nawabshah on Wednesday afternoon, were offered today (Thursday), Geo News reported.

The air of Daulatpur is still filled with grief and many heartrending events were witnessed at the funeral of the seventeen victims.

It is pertinent to mention here that 22 persons including 17 schoolchildren died when their van was crushed by a dumper on the Nawabshah-Qazi Ahmed Link Road on Wednesday.

The five adults included the van driver and two school teachers. The van with 30 students and two teachers on board had gone to Nawabshah from Daulatpur where the schoolchildren took part in a quiz contest. While on its way back to Nawabshah, the van met with the tragic accident.

The impact of the collision was so severe that it hurled the occupants of the van out of it, and when the rescue teams arrived at the scene of the accident, they found the bodies scattered all over the place. The children were from Class III to Class VIII.

On receiving information, police, Edhi and other relief teams rushed to the accident site and started relief work. The injured and bodies were taken to the People’s Medical University Hospital where doctors and paramedical staff were summoned in emergency.

The two teachers were identified as Ameen and Qari Bashir while the driver was identified as Sachal Korai. Six children were later shifted to Karachi for treatment.

A large number of people from Nawabshah, Daulatpur, Sakrand and Qazi Ahmed arrived at the hospital for blood donation. Some hearbreaking scenes were witnessed at the hospital where the relatives of children were in a hysterical state.

PPP leader Faryal Talpur, in her personal capacity, announced Rs500,000 for the parents of each child who had died in the accident.

President Mamnoon Hussain, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, MQM chief Altaf Hussain and the PPP patron-in-chief Bilawal Bhutto Zardari expressed shock and condolences over the death of young students in the road accident in Nawabshah.

In their separate messages, they prayed that Almighty Allah rest the departed souls in eternal peace and grant courage to the bereaved families to bear the loss with equanimity. They also prayed for the early recovery of the injured students.

Source: www.geo.tv

Treason case hearing adjourned till Friday


ISLAMABAD: The special court set up by the government to try the former army chief and president General (retd) Pervez Musharraf on charges of treason for imposing emergency in 2007 adjourned the hearing till Friday (tomorrow), Geo News reported Thursday.

Pervez Musharraf did not yet appear before the special court today as well due to his health condition.

The certificate pertaining to the inability of Pervez Musharraf to appear before the court was produced by his lawyer on the commencement of the proceedings today.

Prosecutor Akram Sheikh argued that the court summoned Musharraf six times but the accused did not appear before the bench which can be considered contempt of the court. He further contended that courts do not wait for the accused and then quoted the example of Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak who was brought on a stretcher.

He said the accused loses the right to defend himself if he does not surrender to the court.

Anwar Mansoor, the counsel of Musharraf, told the court that he had to reach Islamabad High Court to submit intra-court appeal.

The court adjourned the proceedings after hearing the counsels of both sides and reserved the order on today’s hearing till 3:00pm.

A three-judge bench of the court, headed by Justice Faisal Arab, had summoned the former president after giving its verdict pertaining to the proceedings of the case under criminal procedure. The court had ordered him to appear today (January 16). It was predicted that the court might consider issuance of his arrest warrant.

Well informed sources had told that it was not possible for Musharraf to travel to Islamabad from Rawalpindi hospital where he was admitted and under treatment for his ailments, including the cardiac problem.

“The doctors who conducted his test during the week kept on discussing about the state of his health to allow him to proceed to the federal capital for appearing before the special court or otherwise throughout the day on Wednesday. They ultimately decided to advise the former military ruler to desist from taking the trouble of going to Islamabad.”

The team of doctors was headed by Maj Gen Syed Muhammad Imran Majeed, Commandant of the Armed Forces Institute of Cardiology (AFIC), Rawalpindi.

Musharraf's counsel Ahmed Raza Kasuri, onWednesday, said the doctors had not yet declared Pervez Musharraf to have completely recovered from his illness. He further said that Pervez Musharraf could not take mental pressure for his current state of health.

Ahmad Raza Kasuri said that Pervez Musharraf’s exemption from appearance in the court would be sought verbally. He further stated that the former president was facing security threats as well.

Last week, the court ordered Musharraf to appear before it on January 16 to face charges of high treason after reviewing a medical report from the Armed Forced Institute of Cardiology (AFIC), where he was admitted with heart problems on January 2.

Source: www.geo.tv

Wednesday, January 15, 2014

From Nirun-Kot to Hyderabad "History of Hyderabad"

Niaz Stadium Hyderabad 

State Bank Building at Thandi Sarak Hyderabad 

Hyder Chowk Hyderabad 

Model School Sindh University Old Campus

Pakka Qila Hyderabad 


Model School Sindh University Old Campus

Kacha Qila, Hyderabad

Market, Hyderabad

Pakka Qila, Hyderabad


Hyderabad is a city, district and division in the Sindh province. The city is an administrative headquarters lying on the most northern hill of the Ganjo Takkar ridge just east of the River Indus. Being the third largest city of Pakistan, Hyderabad is a communication center, connected by rail with Peshawar and Karachi.

Founded in 1768 on the site of the ancient town of Nirun-Kot by Ghulam Shah Kalhora, the saintly ruler of Sindh, it was named after the prophet Mohammed's son-in-law, Ali, also known as Haidar. It remained the capital of sindh under the Talpur rulers who succeeded the Kalhoras till 1843 when, after the nearby battles of Miani and Dabo, it surrendered to the British, the capital was then transferred to Karachi.

Incorporated as a municipality in 1853, it is an important commercial and industrial center. Its economic activities include textile, sugar, cement, and hosiery mills, manufacturing of glass, soap, ice, paper, and plastics. There are hide tanneries and sawmills. Ornamented silks, silver-work, gold-work and lacquer ware are also some of its exclusive products. Noteworthy antiquities include the tombs of the Kalhora and Talpur ruler, palaces of the former amirs of Sindh. Newly developed settlements and industrial estates surround the congested old city area. An noteworthy characteristic of this city is, badgirs (wind-catchers) fixed to housetops to catch sea breezes during the hot summer season. A hospital, municipal gardens, zoo, sports stadium, and several literary societies are in the city. The University of Sindh with 32 affiliated colleges was founded in 1947 in Karachi and moved to Hyderabad in 1951, where it lies across the Indus. Other education needs are served by numerous government colleges, the Liaquat Medical College and specialized vocational institutions. 

remained the capital of the emirate of Sindh until the British general Sir Charles James Napier conquered Sindh in 1843. From 1947 to 1955 Hyderabad was the capital of Sindh Province, the new capital was shifted to Hyderabad. In 1766 the Kalhora ruler constructed a fort half a square km in area and still stands today. In 1843 the British arrived and defeated the Talpurs, Completing their Conquest of Sindh.

Hyderabad CItyIt's also a second largest city of Sindh Province. It has over 6 Millions population. The city has one of the most interesting bazaar of the country, which is known to be the longest bazaar in Asia. There are two very well arranged ethnological museums in the city One The Sindh Museum and the other the Institute of Sindhology Museum. Both museums present an excellent portrait of cultural and tribal life of Sindh. The city is transit point for the tours from Karachi to the Interior of Sindh A visit to Kalhora Monuments close to the city gate is worth a visit, Mausoleums are beautifully decorated with glazed tiles and frescos. There are also two forts from 18th & 19th Century to see here.

Famous for its cool breeze and balmy nights, and known for its Bombay Bakery Cakes, Its delicate bangles and the paagalkhana called Giddu Bandar, Hyderabad is Sindh's Second largest city, a city its inhabitants claim is the most beautiful in the world, Its spacious houses are known for their manghan, roshandans or ventilators and it is also known as "mangham jo shahar."

'The heart of Sindh' as many call Hyderabad, was the former capital of Sindh, ruled by the Kalhoras and Talpurs from the Pacca Qila until the British conquest.

A nerve center of Sindh nationalist and literary movements, the city is now divided along on Sindhi-Mohajir lines to the extent that the warning ethnic groups even have different hospitals and in many cases, even their places of worship and graveyards are divided. The original old city, now dominated by the mohajirs, seems besieged by the surrounding Sindhi suburbs. At one time a hub of economic, educational and cultural activities, a breeding ground of academicians, philanthropists, writers, lawyers, politicians, journalists, actors and actresses, Hyderabad also had its industrialists, trade unionists, political activists, bureaucrats, bankers and diplomats who made a significant contribution to sub continental society. But this gracious city now seems to be slowly dying, although it still produces over a couple of dozen major and minor newspapers in both Sindhi and Urdu.

Hyderabad, once the capital of Sindh and now the eighth largest city of Pakistan, is one of the oldest cities of the sub-continent. Its history dates back to pre-Islamic times, when Ganjo Taken (barren hill), a nearby hilly tract, was used as a place of worship. The city traces its early history to Neroon, a Hindu ruler of the area from whom the city derived its previous name, "Neroon Kot".

From Kolachi to Karachi "History of Karachi"

KARACHI

KARACHI

KARACHI

KARACHI

KARACHI


Karachi, city (1998 pop. 9,269,265), largest city and former capital of Pakistan, SE Pakistan, on the Arabian Sea near the Indus River delta. The capital of Sind prov., it is Pakistan's chief seaport and industrial center, a transportation, commercial, and financial hub, and a military headquarters. It has a large automobile assembly plant, an oil refinery, a steel mill, shipbuilding, railroad yards, jute and textile factories, printing and publishing plants, media and entertainment industries, food processing plants, and chemical and engineering works. Karachi airport is one of the busiest in Asia. Karachi has a university and other educational institutions; the national museum, with a fine archaeological collection; and the tomb of Muhammad Ali Jinnah, founder of Pakistan.

An old settlement, Karachi was developed as a port and trading center by Hindu merchants in the early 18th cent. In 1843 it passed to the British, who made it the seat of the Sind government. Steady improvements in harbor facilities made Karachi a leading Indian port by the late 19th cent., while agricultural development of the hinterland gave it a large export trade. Karachi served as Pakistan's capital from 1947, when the country gained independence, until 1959, when Rawalpindi became the interim capital pending completion of Islamabad. The political base of the Bhutto family, Karachi has been troubled since the 1980s by violence between local Sindhis and the descendants of muhajirs, the Muslim immigrants who fled to Pakistan following partition in 1947; the lawlessness in the city was further aggravated by Sunni-Shiite fighting in the 1990s. In the late 1990s the government began efforts to suppress the violence, but these have been only sporadically successful.

The Baloch tribes from Balochistan and Makran established a small settlement of fishing communities, many of whom still inhabit sections of Sindh, and called it Kolachi. The modern port-city of Karachi, however, was developed by authorities of the British Raj in the 19th century. Upon the independence of Pakistan in 1947, the city was selected to become the national capital, and was settled by Muslim refugees from India, which radically expanded the city's population and transformed the demographics and economy. Karachi has faced major infrastructural and socio-economic challenges, but modern industries and businesses have developed in the city, and the population expanded even after the capital was moved to Islamabad in August 1960. 

The area of Karachi has been known to the ancient Greeks by many names: Krokola, the place where Alexander the Great camped to prepare a fleet for Babylonia after his campaign in the Indus valley; 'Morontobara' port (probably the modern Manora Island near the Karachi harbor), from where Alexander's admiral Nearchus sailed for back home; and Barbarikon, a sea port of the Indo-Greek Bactrian kingdom. It was also known as the port of Debal to the Arabs, from where Muhammad bin Qasim led his conquering force into South Asia in 712 AD. According to the British historian Eliot, parts of city of Karachi and the island of Manora constituted the city of Debal.

The present city started its life as a fishing settlement where a Sindhi fisherwoman by the name of Mai Kolachi took up residence and started a family. The village that later grew out of this settlement was known as Kolachi-jo-Goth (The Village of Kolachi in Sindhi). By the late 1700s this village started trading across the sea with Muscat and the Persian Gulf region which led to its gaining importance. A small fort was constructed for its protection, armed with cannons imported from Muscat. The fort had two main gateways: one facing the sea, known as Khara Darwaaza (Brackish Gate) and the other facing the adjoining Lyari river known as the Meetha Darwaaza (Sweet Gate). The location of these gates corresponds to the present-day city localities of Khaaradar and Meethadar respectively.


An old image of MA Jinnah Road Karachi from 1889

In 1795, the village became a domain of the Balochi Talpur rulers of Sindh. A small factory was opened by the British in September 1799, but was closed down within a year. After sending a couple of exploratory missions to the area, the British East India Company conquered the town on February 3, 1839. The village was later annexed to the British Indian Empire when the province of Sindh was conquered by Charles Napier in 1843. Kolachi was added along with the rest of Sindh to the jurisdiction of the Bombay Presidency.

The British realized its importance as a military cantonment and a port for exporting the produce of the Indus basin, and rapidly developed its harbour for shipping. The foundations of a city municipal government were laid down and infrastructure development was undertaken. New businesses started opening up and the population of the town started rising rapidly. Karachi quickly turned into a city, making true the famous quote by Napier who is known to have said: Would that I could come again to see you in your grandeur!

In 1857, the First Indian War for Independence broke out in the subcontinent and the 21st Native Infantry stationed in Karachi declared allegiance to revolters, joining their cause on September 10, 1857. However, the British were rapidly able to reassert their control over Karachi and defeat the uprising. Karachi was known as Khurachee Scinde (i.e. Karachi, Sindh) during the early British colonial rule.

In 1864, the first telegraphic message was sent from India to England when a direct telegraph connection was laid down between Karachi and London. In 1878, the city was connected to the rest of British India by railway line. Public building projects such as the Frere Hall (1865) and the Empress Market (1890) were undertaken. In 1876, Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the founder of Pakistan, was born in the city, which by now had become a bustling city with railway, churches, mosques, courthouses, markets, paved streets and a magnificent harbour. By 1899 Karachi had become the largest wheat exporting port in the east (Feldman 1970:57). The population of the city had also risen to about 105,000 inhabitants by the end of the 19th century and was a cosmopolitan mix of Hindus and Muslims, European traders, Jews, Parsis, Iranians, Lebanese, and Goan merchants. By the turn of the century, the city faced street congestion, which led to India’s first tramway system being laid down in 1900.

Frere Hall - a prime example of colonial architecture built during the British Raj


By 1914, Karachi had become the largest grain exporting port of the British Empire. In 1924, an aerodrome was built and Karachi became the main airport of entry into India. An airship mast was also built in Karachi in 1927 as part of the Imperial Airship Communications scheme, which was later abandoned. In 1936, Sindh was separated from the Bombay Presidency and Karachi was made the capital of the new province. By the time the new country of Pakistan was formed in 1947, Karachi had become a bustling metropolitan city with beautiful classical and colonial European styled buildings lining the city’s thoroughfares. Karachi was chosen as the capital city of Pakistan and accommodated a huge influx of migrants and refugees to the newly formed country. The demographics of the city also changed drastically. However, it still maintained a great cultural diversity as its new inhabitants arrived from all parts of the subcontinent.

Friday, January 10, 2014

Dabang SSP Aslam Chudhary Biography with Photographs

SSP Aslam Chudhary


SSP Aslam Chudhary


SSP Aslam Chudhary


SSP Aslam Chudhary


SSP Aslam Chudhary


SSP Aslam Chudhary


SSP Aslam Chudhary


SSP Aslam Chudhary


SSP Aslam Chudhary


Starting his career as a sub-inspector (ASI) in 1984, Muhammad Aslam Khan, who is commonly known as Chaudhry Aslam, is now serving as the Senior Superintendent Police (SSP) of the Central Investigation Department (CID). He has served as a station house officer (SHO) at a number of police stations in the metropolis.

He originally hails from Hazara, but Chaudhry was added in front of his name due to his role in the Karachi operation. In 2010, Khan was appointed as a head of the Investigation Wing of the CID. Earlier, he was heading the Lyari Task Force (LTF) to uproot gangsters from Lyari.

During his service, he has been blamed for staging several fake encounters and has been called by his critics an “encounter specialist”. Once he was also suspended for allegedly killing a person in a fake encounter. However, in a previous interview with The News, he had strongly denied the allegations.

“I have never staged fake encounters in my career, nor have I been involved in extra-judicial killings. All encounters that I have been involved in have been in self-defence,” he said during the interview in August, 2009. “I have no idea why people in Lyari call me ‘Chaudhary Aslam’ or ‘Encounter Specialist’ even though most of the criminals I have arrested are alive and in prison.”

The suicide bombing of his residence was the third attack on Khan during his service. A couple of years ago, he was targeted near Punjab Chowarngi in Clifton. Four people, including an ASI, were gunned down by unidentified culprits in this attack.

During his tenure as the head of the LTF, he was targeted again. Khan was leading a police party searching for notorious gangster Rehman Dakait when armed men opened fire on the police. At least two constables died on the spot, while Khan remained unharmed.

Khan conducted raids against banned outfits, including Lashkar-e-Jhangvl (LJ) and Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), Lyari’s warlord Rehman Dakait and other criminals operating in the city.

TTP Ameer Qari Saeed Anwar was arrested during one of the raids conducted by the police under SSP Khan’s supervision. The police also arrested Saeed’s deputy, a man named Akhtar Zaman in the same raid.

The TTP leaders had arrived in Karachi to avenge the death of Baitullah Mehsud and were planning to attack the Karachi Oil Terminal. The police had recovered seven suicide jackets, weighing around 28 kilograme each, and also seized heavy quantity of T&T blocks and 250 detonators.

Waseem Baroodi, a key member of the LJ, was also arrested by Khan. Baroodi was said to be a mastermind of sectarian violence in the city.

Wednesday, January 1, 2014

NZ's Anderson breaks Afridi’s fastest ODI century record



QUEENSTOWN: New Zealand's Corey Anderson clubbed the fastest century in the history of one-day international cricket — from 36 balls — as the hosts reached 283-4 from only 21 overs in Wednesday's rain-shortened third one-dayer against the West Indies.

The young all-rounder hit 12 sixes and four fours in his 100, beating, by one delivery, the 37-ball record of Shahid Afridi against Sri Lanka which has stood for almost 18 years.

Anderson finished on 131 not out from 47 balls, as New Zealand scored at an extraordinary 13 runs per over.

He put on 191 for the fourth wicket with Jesse Ryder who made 104 from 51 balls — the sixth-fastest century in one-day internationals. Ryder is in his comeback to international cricket after a two-year absence.

Captain Brendon McCullum set the momentum of the New Zealand innings when he smashed 33 from 11 balls, coming in following the dismissal of opener Martin Guptill for one after the home team was sent in to bat.

McCullum plundered 24 runs from his first five balls, and Ryder joined in, hitting consecutive sixes from Jason Holder as the pair raced to a 50-run partnership from 18 deliveries.

Ryder took over when McCullum was out caught in the deep, and dashed to his half century in 24 balls with four fours and four sixes.

Ryder, who was for a duck in his comeback game at the start of this series, was back to his most belligerent form on Wednesday, but was overshadowed by Anderson who played one of the most remarkable innings in the history of one-day cricket.

Anderson reached 50 from only 30 balls, with two fours and six sixes and after hitting four consecutive sixes from the bowling on of Sunil Narine. He then repeated the feat and hit four sixes in an over from Rampaul whose three overs conceded 64 runs.

Anderson was 95 not out after 35 balls, needing a six off the next ball to break Afridi's record. Though unaware of the beckoning record, he swatted the next ball from spinner Nikita Miller out of the ground to break the world record.

He hit another six from the next ball to raise a 150-run partnership with Ryder in only 36 minutes.

Ryder reached his century from 46 balls and was out five balls from the end of the New Zealand innings for 104, which included five sixes and 12 fours.

Currency Note of Rs. 10,000, Rs. 2000 & Rs. 200 will be Launched Soon



The highest denomination note of Rs. 10,000  will be launched by State Bank of Pakistan according to reports.it will be a biggest note of Pakistan as now highest denomination note is Rs 5000 in a Pakistan that was introduced on 27th May 2006. The note of Rs. 10,000 is in light color with Quaid’s portrait.

As State Bank of Pakistan had used modern forgery techniques till now. But according to a spokesman State Bank of Pakistan citizen of Pakistan also complained about the security and features in a currency notes that we are using now days. People also said that if a currency note of a 2000 will be launched then our currency will be badly affected.

Some people were in favor of it but some did not appreciate this idea and also suggested that Rs. 2000 note is a great but Rs. 2000 note is not right. Few businessmen said that it is good because it will become easier to carry a big amount of money.

The photo of Rs. 10,000 note is available on an internet but it’s not sure that is it the original design prepared by State Bank of Pakistan so it can be change because State Bank of Pakistan did not conform about it.

316 Billion SMS Sent By Pakistani Mobile Users During 2012-2013


315.7 Billion short text messages popularly known as SMS have been exchanged between Pakistani mobile users during a time span ranging from July 2012 to June 2013. This concludes that 865 Million SMS have been sent in a single day. These statistics are revealed by Pakistan Telecommunication Authority.

SMS prices in Pakistan have dropped by almost 50% during the last five years owing to the fierce competition between Telecom companies operating in Pakistan. This has been the dominating factor that has caused people to send more and more SMS.

According to PTA SMS is the most popular medium of communication in Pakistan. This is the area where 13.68% growth has been observed in 2012-2013. Reminding you the fact that SMS traffic was boosted up to 1 Billion daily during Election 2013 in Pakistan.

It has been recorded that the number of SMS that a mobile phone user send in a month on the average has grown from 131 SMS (2009-2010) per user to 214 SMS per user per month (2012-2013). As a matter of fact this trend is going to continue to grow for about 1-2 years when it is highly anticipated that 3G technology will take over Pakistan in 2014 and WhatsApp, Skype and Viber will have major portion in the market covered under their hood.